What happens when big promises come with no deadlines? JEDCO invested heavily in Explorer Aircraft — $108K loan, $200K grant, land, and a facility rent-free for three years. They promised 70 jobs. But when pressed for payments years later, the aircraft was moved out. No production. No jobs. Just money spent.

No wonder they don’t want to give up that free money! Jasper pays, JEDCO plays. Are you okay with that?

I kept looking at the pieces — the expired terms, the legal authority, the open discussion event — and then it hit me — this isn’t about JEDCO. It’s about City Council. They are the ones who hold the power. The real decision-makers will not be at this event — they’re in City Council chambers.

Board members serve until replaced by City Council — a fact confirmed by Mr. Walker himself, who stated, “We serve until we’re replaced by the city council.”

City Council could have enforced change at any time. But they haven’t. Some JEDCO board members have remained in place for 16 years, despite Texas law stating that no individual term may exceed six years.

According to Texas Local Government Code §504.051, the law is clear:

• City Council appoints every JEDCO board member.
• No individual term may exceed six years.
• Terms are staggered.
• City Council can remove board members at any time, with or without cause.

That being said, let’s take a closer look at our Council and their stance on JEDCO.

Bob Mayhar and Lequin Hilderbrand aren’t neutral players — they are deeply tied to JEDCO’s leadership.

Bob Mayhar (District 2) was handpicked by Danny Walker, ensuring his loyalty to JEDCO’s leadership.

Lequin Hilderbrand (also District 2) sits on the JEDCO board, meaning he has a direct stake in keeping things as they are.

DeMarcus Holmes (District 3) has historically aligned with JEDCO, but my hope is he will not reinforce the existing system — rather push for change.

Mamie Horn Aplon (District 1) has spoken out — expired terms should be given up.

Angel McCroskey (District 4) has consistently stood up for the law and with the people.

The mayor, who is also from District 2, may not have a vote, but he has influence, and his stance on JEDCO has remained in line with preserving its structure.

The question isn’t just whether City Council will act — it’s whether the majority will push past District 2’s grip on JEDCO.

District 2 may have shaped much of Jasper’s leadership, but its influence cannot drown out the voices of those demanding change.

City Council has the authority to fix this — but they’ve chosen not to. The law is clear, and the people of Jasper must demand that their representatives uphold it. And if they won’t, they should be recalled and replaced.

This City Council has a rare opportunity — one that will define its legacy for years to come. The decisions they make today will determine whether Jasper moves forward toward true representation or remains under the influence of a select few. This is their chance to step beyond political alliances and serve every citizen — not just those who have long held the power.

Real leadership isn’t about maintaining the status quo. It’s about recognizing when change is necessary and having the courage to act. The question now is whether City Council will seize this moment — or allow history to repeat itself.

Public relations theater won’t bring accountability. Only action will. And that action starts with the people holding their leaders’ feet to the fire and demanding they follow the law.

“I put my hand on the Bible to do the right thing and I am here to let the whole city know, whoever needs to know, that we are going to do it right, we are going to do it together and it’s going to be done right.”

~ Mamie Horn Aplon

If anyone believed Jasper’s leadership shift would bring transparency and fairness, this week’s City Council meeting shattered that illusion. What unfolded wasn’t governance — it was a calculated effort to solidify control, played out in real time for everyone watching.

Before the council could push through their predetermined JEDCO appointments, citizens took the floor — and they did not hold back.

Tena Salada Wright called out the deeply entrenched power structure, exposing how the same hands pull the strings from the shadows, protected by generational alliances designed to prevent accountability. Her warning was direct:

“What is shocking now is not the betrayal itself but the boldness of it… They bet on our silence. But here’s the thing — we do see it. More of us than ever are awake to the games being played by JEDCO.”

Tena Salada Wright

Steve Martinez followed with a brutal reality check: Jasper is falling behind economically while neighboring communities thrive. Million-dollar investments are flooding into Newton and Rayburn, while Jasper businesses close their doors. Yet, the same figures remain in power, ensuring stagnation instead of growth.

“This isn’t about politics. It’s about our future. Our neighbors are growing, but why isn’t Jasper? Legacy matters, and when history looks back on these moments, it’ll remember who fought for progress — and who clung to power.”

Steve Martinez

Their speeches weren’t just complaints — they were a rallying cry. Jasper’s residents are paying attention, talking louder, organizing stronger.

Then came the meeting’s main event — the JEDCO board appointments discussion. The mayor wasted no time, announcing a process that hadn’t been discussed or agreed upon: each council member would pick one board member, continuing down the line until the seats were filled.

Councilman Lequin Hilderbrand attempted to justify keeping JEDCO’s power structure intact, stating that due to the number of open files, the city “needs to keep 8 or 9 of the most engaged current JEDCO board members.”

But when looking at the leaked list, it’s clear who that benefits — Danny Walker, Bill Snelson, Charles Warren, Chris Lanier, Anne Marie Limbrick, Willie King, and newly revived “retired” executive director Eddie Hopkins. Many of these individuals have outstayed their terms by years, yet instead of fresh leadership, the plan is to recycle the same players under the guise of stability.

Angel McCroskey immediately challenged the legitimacy of the process, pressing the mayor on why he was choosing board members by going down the line and asking if there was a law or precedent that dictated this approach. Instead of citing any legal basis, the mayor deflected, dismissing her concerns with condescension, saying, “Is there a law that says I can’t?”

McCroskey wasn’t questioning his right to make appointments — she was challenging whether the council was making informed, lawful decisions at all. What she pointed out next made his deflection even more glaring.

This council had been advised to meet beforehand to properly discuss JEDCO appointments — before this mayor and this council even took office. Instead of acknowledging that key fact, he attempted to make it personal, claiming he had tried to meet with her several times. But McCroskey swiftly shut down that narrative — yes, she had met with him once, but that was during his campaign, when he had no authority over council matters. His personal outreach was beside the point — what truly mattered was that the previous council had been advised to meet as a group to discuss changes to the board, and that meeting never happened.

As McCroskey was pressing the mayor on why board members were being chosen by going down the line — questioning whether there was any legal precedent for his approach — Mamie Horne spoke up. Without hesitation, McCroskey responded, “If you make a motion, I will second it.”

Horne took the step, calling for the council to postpone the decision until next month and hold a public workshop where citizens could be involved and ask questions.

She secured a second and ensured that, at least for now, this process will not take place the way those in power had planned.

And then, Lequin Hilderbrand — who had remained quiet while McCroskey fought for transparency — finally spoke up. “Ms. McCroskey is absolutely right. We should have met as a council.”

The timing was remarkable. For weeks, McCroskey had been pushing for this meeting. For weeks, she was met with dismissal. But now, with public scrutiny sharpening and citizens demanding accountability, suddenly her argument was valid.

The question isn’t just why Hilderbrand made this statement — it’s why he waited until now to say it.

Make no mistake — all of this wasn’t governance. This was preservation of power.

McCroskey’s legitimate concerns were dismissed. Citizens spoke out — but will leadership listen?

And the mayor? His personal ties to Walker became a point of contention, fueling the growing suspicion that JEDCO’s grip on Jasper is as strong as ever.

But here’s the thing — the illusion is cracking.

JEDCO’s influence isn’t subtle anymore — it’s bold, unapologetic, and dangerously unchallenged.

The only question left is — how long will Jasper let them move unchecked?

Silence has been their greatest weapon. But Jasper is waking up.

Link to article and video in the comments.

Bob Mayhar finally answered the question! Apparently, a “reworked, strong JEDCO” just means the same old players keeping their seats… with a few hand-picked new recruits ready to fall in line.

⬇️⬇️⬇️ link to article ⬇️⬇️⬇️

https://www.kjas.com/news/local_news/article_71218921-3290-4188-ae49-0f96ce9b97d1.html

Jasper’s leadership has entered a new phase, and the consequences of unchecked power are now unfolding in real time. What started as political maneuvering before the election has rapidly escalated into strategic appointments, blocked oversight, and legal findings that conveniently sidestep the toughest questions. While concerns about JEDCO’s inner workings have lingered for years, the latest actions confirm what many feared — the structure of power in Jasper isn’t being adjusted for better governance; it’s being fortified to serve the few.

Jasper’s New Leadership Moves Fast — But At What Cost?

An agenda for a special-called meeting has been posted for Monday, May 12, with a key item: the removal and appointment of board members to Jasper Economic Development Corporation (JEDCO).

Danny Walker isn’t wasting any time pushing his agenda forward.

Just as he stated in a recent video, Walker openly admitted that he had someone run on his behalf in the election, hoping this would bring what he called “a better council.” He was referring to the voting record of Council members Sample and McCroskey, implying that their decisions had slowed JEDCO’s plans.

His frustration became crystal clear when he publicly reprimanded Sample for voting against JEDCO, treating him like a schoolboy being scolded for stepping out of line. It sent an unmistakable message — Walker and JEDCO expect loyalty. And now, with his hand-picked candidates securing key positions, he’s proving that he has the influence to make things move.

Jasper is a small town. Many residents have been here for generations, and the powers at play now have been in control for a long time.

JEDCO has long been a point of contention, with its practices and financial losses repeatedly questioned over the years. Despite this, those in control have always found ways to maintain their grip — and now, we’re seeing those same tactics unfolding once again.

We all know the conversations that have swirled around this economic development board. Oversight has been a persistent concern, yet the people in charge continue operating unchecked, facing little resistance.

Walker’s Influence & The Election Shift

On May 3, 2025, Jasper held its election. While elections often bring change, this one came with a distinct power shift — one that appears to be strategic rather than organic.

Walker, long associated with JEDCO’s inner circle, was “having” someone run for the Councilman District 2 seat — and he (Bob Mayhar) won. Mayor Clark McClane also won, and coincidentally, both he and Mayhar reside in District 2, along with Councilman Lequin Hilderbrand.

With three council members now from the same district, Walker’s influence appears stronger than ever. And if Mayhar is Walker’s pick, then it wouldn’t be surprising if McClane fits into the same dynamic.

The Immediate Push for Control

The new council wasted no time, holding a special meeting just three days after the election, on May 6. Without first reviewing the legal opinion together as a team, they waived attorney-client privilege and released it.

One glaring issue? The primary question that led to seeking the legal opinion — whether JEDCO’s directors with long-expired terms were legally serving — wasn’t even addressed. Instead, the opinion affirmed JEDCO’s existence but avoided the most pressing issue.

That silence speaks volumes.

And as their first official act, Walker’s allies immediately set their sights on restructuring leadership within the council itself.

During the very first meeting of the new council, Hilderbrand motioned for DeMarcus Holmes to be named Mayor Pro Tem, stating:

“Mr. Mayor, as a way to maybe keep the boy here at the meetings, I would like to nominate…”

Councilman Lequin Hilderbrand

Holmes, who works out of town frequently and has a history of absences, was suddenly elevated into a leadership role — one that requires consistent presence and decision-making.

Was this about securing strong leadership — or rewarding Holmes for his loyalty?

Holmes had just voted against McCroskey’s motion to remove and replace expired board members — a vote that helped Walker’s faction maintain control over JEDCO. And now, Hilderbrand wasted no time in ensuring Holmes got a leadership position in return.

Instead of addressing transparency concerns, the council moved to secure power for their allies, reinforcing the pattern of control.

Inside Knowledge or Coordination?

At the April 22nd JEDCO meeting, Walker claimed he had not seen the legal opinion from the attorneys, yet confidently stated he “knows pretty well what’s in it.” He also declared that JEDCO is a legal board, that its members serve until replaced, and that none of them had ever been replaced.

This statement raises serious questions:

• If he hadn’t seen the legal opinion, how did he “know pretty well” what it said?
• Why were JEDCO appointments and reappointments never brought to City Council for discussion?
• Was this silence intentional to avoid drawing attention to how long these board members had been serving?

Walker then shifted the narrative further, stating that JEDCO had been advised not to meet until the legal opinion was available — but then later claimed that, despite still not seeing the opinion, the mayor and City Attorney Billy Morian III told him JEDCO could meet.

If Walker hadn’t seen the opinion, why was he making definitive statements about its contents? The inconsistencies in his comments suggest inside coordination rather than true transparency.

Early Warning Signs & The Push for Control

Even before the legal opinion was released, Councilwoman McCroskey recognized the issue and acted. She motioned to remove and replace expired-term JEDCO board members with capable citizens — but the motion was immediately voted down by Hilderbrand and Holmes, with the mayor breaking the tie.

This moment is telling — Walker’s faction was determined to block oversight and keep expired board members in place, rather than appoint new qualified individuals.

Then, Holmes — just days after helping block oversight — was rewarded with the Mayor Pro Tem position.

Instead of addressing transparency concerns, the council moved to secure power for their allies, reinforcing the pattern of control.

Garza’s Legal Opinion — What Information Was He Given?

Frank Garza’s legal opinion was based on the records and information he received. He stated in his findings that he reviewed proposed revisions to JEDCO’s bylaws — confirming that City Council has the authority to identify the number of board members and list who they should be.

But this raises another important question:

Who provided Garza with the proposed revisions to JEDCO’s bylaws?

Since City Council hadn’t taken action on revisions, were these quietly fed to Garza by JEDCO through Jasper’s own City Attorney?

If that’s the case, why was JEDCO shaping its own governance behind the scenes — without direct council oversight?

Jasper’s Crossroads: Oversight or Power Politics?

At this point, residents of Jasper must ask:

• Why was the most pressing legal question about expired-term directors ignored?
• Why did the new council waive privilege so quickly without full discussion?
• Why is JEDCO’s board being reshaped so soon after the election?
• Who provided Garza with proposed revisions to JEDCO’s bylaws — and why was this done outside normal City Council oversight?

Transparency isn’t just about making information public — it’s about making decisions the right way. Jasper stands at a crossroads: Will city leadership be held accountable, or will influence continue to dictate governance?

There have been rumblings about dissolving JEDCO altogether, and the truth is, the people hold the real power here. Leadership shouldn’t be about securing control for the few — it should be about serving the many. The time has come to remove the forces that seek influence for themselves and return the power — and the funds — back to the people of Jasper. After all, true economic development should benefit the community, not just those sitting at the table.

Transparency isn’t just about making information public — it’s about how decisions are made, who is involved, and whether the right process is followed.

For weeks, Jasper’s city council has attempted to waive attorney-client privilege and publicly release a legal opinion regarding Jasper Economic Development Corporation (JEDCO) — but without first holding an executive session to properly review it.

And that’s not just an oversight. It’s a pattern.

April 14: The Postponement

During the April 14 meeting, an agenda item was introduced to waive attorney-client communications and release the memorandum. Instead of proceeding immediately, Councilwoman Angel McCroskey made a motion to postpone the matter, stating that council should first meet in a closed session with the city attorney, as is standard practice and as advised by the city’s tax-paid legal expert. The motion was seconded by Councilman Ronald Sample, ensuring formal support for the delay.

April 21: The First Failed Meeting

A special meeting was called to discuss the memorandum and take any actions necessary. The meeting could not proceed due to the lack of quorum, as Council members Hilderbrand and Holmes were absent.

May 1: The Second Failed Meeting

Another special meeting was scheduled for the waiver of attorney-client privilege.

No quorum — again. Council member McCroskey was absent. While the reason for her absence is unclear, it would not be surprising if it were due to her consistent stance that an executive session should be held before waiving privilege. DeMarcus Holmes was out of town, but despite Zoom being set up, he did not video in.

May 8: The Push Continues

Instead of regrouping and adding a closed session to the agenda — as is standard practice and was advised by the city attorney — the same item to waive attorney-client privilege and release the memorandum to the public has been reposted for next week’s regular meeting.

I don’t get it. Why skip the logical step of meeting privately as a council before releasing the memorandum? Whether waiving privilege is warranted or not — I don’t know. But what I do know is that the process is being actively bypassed.

History Repeating Itself

This situation isn’t happening in a vacuum. Ignoring procedures is exactly how JEDCO got into this mess to begin with. Lack of oversight, rushed decisions, and bypassing standard processes have already led to controversy and confusion — so why continue making the same mistakes?

Why hasn’t council scheduled a closed session to review the memorandum as a team, as recommended by the city attorney?

Why is the push to waive privilege happening before proper discussion?

Who stands to gain from rushing this forward — and who loses the chance to weigh in?

If transparency is the goal, why sidestep the process that ensures informed decisions?

This isn’t just about one legal opinion. It’s about whether government procedure matters — or if it can be ignored when convenient.

Because transparency isn’t just about making information public — it’s about making it public the right way.

Jasper’s Special Called Meeting: Transparency or Tactical Maneuver?

An agenda for a special called meeting has been posted, calling for the waiver of attorney-client privilege and the immediate release of a legal opinion regarding Jasper Economic Development Corporation (JEDCO).

At first glance, this might seem like a step toward transparency—but the timeline tells a different story.

At the April 14th meeting, agenda item 14 proposed waiving attorney-client privilege to make the memorandum public. Before council could move forward, Councilwoman Angel McCroskey made a motion to postpone. She reminded everyone that she had requested a meeting to discuss the opinion as soon as she received it—but that meeting never happened.

Now, with item #14 suddenly appearing on the agenda, McCroskey explained that the council needed a separate meeting with an executive session to be advised by the city attorney and to vote on appointments or possible removal of board members. The mayor fumbled, suggesting the agenda item wasn’t correctly worded, and then turned to Billy Morian for confirmation.

Morian, in his legal voice, stated: “I believe there has been a motion to postpone, and it is my opinion that the council does need to convene in a closed group to discuss the opinions of the memorandum and discuss what actions need to be taken.”

Who called the meeting for Thursday May 1st and why? Under the city charter, it takes two council members or the mayor to call a meeting. On April 14th, McCroskey and Sample voted to postpone the release of the memorandum, clearly signaling the need for a separate meeting with an executive session before moving forward.

Now, with Demarcus Holmes out of town and Hilderbrand unable to call it alone, that means the mayor is once again the one driving this special meeting—just like he did on April 14th.

Which raises an even bigger question: Why is he pushing so hard?

Who benefits from the release of this memorandum before the council has had a chance to meet with the city attorney in a closed session? Why is due process being sidestepped to rush this out the door? Why is the city attorney silent? During the April 14th meeting, McCroskey followed up on her concerns, requesting a special called meeting on April 21st to ensure council members could properly review and discuss the memorandum before making any decisions.

Yet when the time came, the mayor, Councilman Hilderbrand, and Councilman Holmes did not attend.

Holmes was out of town working—but just days later, he Zoomed into the April 24th meeting and voted. If remote participation was possible then, why wasn’t it utilized earlier? Why skip the conversation, then jump in when it’s time to push decisions forward?

This isn’t an isolated incident. Holmes has missed 14 of the last 30 meetings, but suddenly Zooms into this one to vote? If remote access was an option, why wasn’t it available on April 14th or April 21st? And if it was, why did Holmes miss those meetings?

Now, we’re seeing another special called meeting—without council deliberation—to push through waiving privilege.

So here’s the real question:

Why is there urgency to waive privilege, but no urgency for council members to actually review the legal opinion first?

Who benefits from skipping the discussion in closed session?

Is this about transparency—or controlling the narrative before council members even have a chance to speak?

Jasper residents deserve truth, not carefully orchestrated maneuvers that bypass discussion and accountability. Waiving attorney-client privilege without council members reviewing the memorandum themselves doesn’t serve the people—it serves those looking to control what gets revealed and when.

#justmyopinion

I was sitting today, thinking about creating a video montage of the voices that have brought issues to light — the voices that have dared to challenge the system, spoken up in meetings, and exposed the truths that others would rather keep hidden. And then there are the voices fighting to hold onto power — the ones deflecting, stalling, and maintaining the same structure that keeps accountability out of reach.

But honestly, I know that’s not necessary. You’re smart people — you can see it for yourselves. Across the nation, we’re witnessing a wave of exposure, where government offices and boards of directors are being called out for their lack of transparency and accountability.

Here in Jasper, the same pattern is playing out. Over the past few months, we’ve exposed how JEDCO operates behind closed doors, how financial transparency is lacking, and how the same select group of individuals continues to hold power, shutting out fresh voices and ideas. We’ve seen how Danny Walker’s candidates mimic his vision, reinforcing a system that prioritizes control over progress.

If you’ve seen the video, this was made even clearer during a recent meeting. Mr. Walker lectured and questioned Mr. Sample’s council vote, asking why he didn’t vote for JEDCO to see this legal opinion. Mr. Sample explained that it hadn’t been approved to do so. Walker responded, “But it’s just your vote and it would have been approved,” implying that Sample could have voted for it regardless of readiness.

Mr. Sample didn’t hold back, stating that the board is too big, and some of its members think they’re above everyone else — that they don’t have to answer to anyone. But, he reminded everyone, “They do have to answer to the citizens of Jasper, Texas. Am I right or am I wrong?”

Walker’s response was telling: “Well, that’s what I hope this election does,” he said, adding that he had always preached that JEDCO needs to stay out of politics. He then went on to say that the city needs a new council — or perhaps one that aligns with his vision and votes the way he says to.

That’s when Mr. Sample asked the question: “Why don’t you run?” Walker admitted he doesn’t live within the city limits. When Sample pressed further, asking why Walker doesn’t HAVE someone run, Walker said, “I have,” laughing as he walked away.

And now, we’re hearing conversations around town about how certain individuals are acting as though they’ve already won — making promises for “after” the election that feel like nothing more than stalling tactics. Make no mistake, this kind of behavior isn’t about serving the people — it’s about preserving power and avoiding accountability.

It’s also worth noting that attorney-client privilege exists for a reason. In this situation, the client is the City of Jasper, not JEDCO. The release of details by the city attorney, mayor, and councilman — confirmed more than once by Mr. Walker — raises serious questions about whether this privilege was respected or undermined.

JEDCO does need to stay out of politics. And if they’re looking to remove oversight from the city council, maybe it’s time for the JEDCO board to pull their own funds together and create the corporation they long to govern.

This is a pivotal moment for Jasper. The people hold the cards, and it’s up to you to decide what happens next. Your voice matters. Your voice controls everything. But for too long, we’ve been programmed to believe that without the guidance of a select few, we’re nothing more than taxpayers — expected to mind our business and let them continue doing what they’ve always done.

The truth is clear. The question is, what are we going to do about it?

🚨 An agenda for a special called meeting has been posted — without council discussion. What happens next could reshape the conversation around transparency and oversight in Jasper.

Stay tuned. This isn’t over.

Jasper had an opportunity. It had the chance to build an economic development board filled with citizens who bring real-world experience, business knowledge, and fresh ideas to the table. Instead of embracing that opportunity, leadership chose to keep things exactly as they’ve been.

This isn’t just about positions on a board — it’s about the people who were nominated. These individuals weren’t just random selections; they represent talent, diverse perspectives, and a chance to create a truly collaborative JEDCO. Their experiences could have strengthened local economic development, bringing new ideas and expertise to help Jasper thrive.

Everybody knows that JEDCO presents itself as an open door for ideas — a place where citizens can share their visions for Jasper’s future. But when it comes to actually allowing a new team to lead, that openness disappears. Instead of embracing the fresh perspectives that could push Jasper forward, leadership chose to remain locked in the familiar, unwilling to pass the torch to those who could bring innovation, collaboration, and new energy.

Because of the last few days and seeing the exposure of how things truly run, my focus turned to Councilman DeMarcus Holmes and his vote on the matter. I knew Holmes was out of town, and honestly, I wasn’t sure if he would be present at the meeting. But he was brought in on a Zoom call so he could participate. He had some technical difficulties at the start, but they were quickly resolved.

I don’t know Holmes personally, but his reputation precedes him — a good old country working man, a “one of us” type of person. He’s been on the council longer than anyone, and that kind of longevity makes moments like this feel even more significant. If anyone understood the need for fresh voices, it should have been him.

But that hope was quickly shattered when he voted for the status quo.

Maybe Holmes didn’t fully grasp the gravity of the situation, being out of town and working hard as he often does. Or perhaps there were lingering technical difficulties that influenced his decision. But it’s hard to imagine someone so down-to-earth, so connected to the community, not wanting other Jasper citizens to have a say. Holmes had the chance to leave last night’s meeting as a hero — someone who stood for change and progress.

Instead, his vote wasn’t just another checkmark in the system — it was a choice to preserve control, to ignore talent, and to shut the door on meaningful change. In that moment, Holmes had the chance to break the cycle, to side with fresh leadership, and to push Jasper toward something better. But he didn’t.

Holmes probably won’t see this, but the reality remains — he still has the ability to take a stand. He could call another special meeting, readdress the issue, and choose to vote for the people. Whether he takes that stand or continues to uphold the entrenched system is his personal crossroad.

Jasper deserves leadership that sees the value in its own people — that recognizes the talent within the community and allows it to shine. The citizens of Jasper shouldn’t forget this moment, because missed opportunities like this don’t just slow down progress — they ensure that the same problems will continue, unchecked.

Tonight, the citizens of Jasper have an opportunity to witness a pivotal moment in our city’s leadership. Tonight’s city council meeting will address critical issues, including the memorandum from attorney Frank J. Garza and the potential removal and appointment of JEDCO directors. These decisions carry significant weight for the future of Jasper’s economic development and the trust between leadership and the public.

The remarks made by JEDCO President Danny Walker in recent days have only heightened the importance of this meeting. Whether Mayor Anderson Land, Councilman Lequin Hilderbrand, or Councilman DeMarcus Holmes attend and how they vote will be telling. Their actions — or lack thereof — will reveal whether they stand with the people who elected them or with the entrenched interests that have long controlled JEDCO.

While every council member has the right to vote their conscience, the people of Jasper will be watching closely. This meeting isn’t just about JEDCO — it’s a reflection of the broader relationship between government and the people it serves. The citizens of Jasper deserve leadership that listens, engages, and acts in their best interest. Tonight’s meeting is a chance for our leaders to prove they are willing to uphold these values.

The stakes are high, and the people are watching. Let’s hope our leaders rise to the occasion.

JEDCO was never meant to be the personal playground of a select few. It was established as an economic development entity for the people of Jasper, funded by their tax dollars, with the goal of supporting and growing our local economy in a way that benefits everyone. Yet, somewhere along the way, it seems to have shifted — no longer functioning as a resource for the community, but instead operating as an exclusive club, controlled by a small, chosen group.

Transparency and accountability aren’t about tearing JEDCO down. They’re about making sure it truly serves the people, not just the few individuals who have cemented themselves in power. Jasper is filled with capable, qualified individuals who could contribute to JEDCO’s mission, yet they are rarely given the opportunity. Instead, board positions seem to be reserved for those already within the inner circle, as if leadership is determined by “who you know” rather than “who is best for the job.”

I have spoken with many citizens who have extensive experience and ideas that would be invaluable to JEDCO as part of a collaborative effort. These individuals bring fresh perspectives, strong leadership qualities, and a genuine commitment to economic growth — but instead of being welcomed into the fold, they are shut out simply because they aren’t part of the chosen few.

And while JEDCO board members often insist that the public should bring their ideas forward, I have seen, heard, and read countless instances where those efforts go nowhere. People step up, hoping to contribute, only to feel like their input is dismissed before it’s even considered. If economic development is truly meant to be a partnership between the board and the people, then why does it seem like those outside the inner circle are met with resistance instead of collaboration?

Yet, over time, it seems that some boards — including JEDCO — have drifted away from the original vision set by the Development Corporation Act of 1979. Instead of rotating leadership and embracing new perspectives, the structure has remained largely unchanged, making it difficult for fresh voices to contribute.

Economic development was never intended to be controlled by a handful of individuals indefinitely. It thrives on innovation, diverse input, and a shared commitment to the community’s growth. But when leadership positions are locked in for years, and the same names cycle through positions of influence, it becomes less about “serving the people” and more about “preserving power.”

True economic development requires inclusivity — giving qualified individuals a chance to bring fresh ideas to the table. Jasper has no shortage of talented citizens ready to contribute, but when only the chosen few are given the opportunity, the organization loses the very spirit it was built upon.

Interestingly, Mr. Walker himself referenced the Development Corporation Act of 1979 during the JEDCO meeting, acknowledging the law that set the foundation for economic development in Texas. But if JEDCO truly operates under the spirit of that act, then shouldn’t it reflect the very principles it was founded on — community engagement, fairness, and accessibility? Instead, leadership remains in the hands of a select few, making it nearly impossible for new voices to have a seat at the table.

The act wasn’t designed to create a permanent, untouchable power structure — it was designed to give communities the ability to shape their own economic future. Yet, when citizens raise concerns or express interest in contributing, they are met with resistance rather than open doors. Economic development is supposed to serve the public — not protect the control of a handful of individuals. So if JEDCO stands by this act, perhaps it’s time they start operating in alignment with it.

This isn’t how an organization funded by the public should operate. Economic development should be a collective effort, driven by inclusion, fresh ideas, and a commitment to the greater good — not by a select few who treat it as their personal institution.

In my view, last night’s JEDCO meeting could be summed up in the five minutes Danny Walker addressed the board from the podium. His remarks didn’t just dominate the conversation — they encapsulated the attitude of the JEDCO board itself: deflective, entrenched, and resistant to accountability.

Walker, JEDCO’s president and a board member for 16 years — who actually signed the organization’s articles of incorporation back in 1993 — took the stage to defend the organization’s actions, or lack thereof, over the past seven months. He revealed that JEDCO had been advised not to meet until a legal opinion determined their legitimacy. Yet, despite still not seeing the opinion, Walker stated that Mayor Anderson Land, Councilman Lequin Hilderbrand, and Attorney Billy Morian assured him it was safe to proceed. Then, after the April 14th city council meeting — where the council voted to delay the release of the legal opinion — Morian and Hilderbrand, disregarding that vote, told Walker they could meet anyway.

Walker’s remarks didn’t stop there. He shifted blame to the city council, stating they should have resolved the issue of expired terms long ago. But this raises an important question: why isn’t JEDCO, with its paid employees, keeping up with reappointments and critical dates? If the organization is truly committed to serving Jasper, shouldn’t it take a more proactive role in ensuring its own compliance?

Then came one of the most tense moments of the night — Walker directly confronted Mr. Sample, stating that Sample owed the JEDCO board an explanation for his vote delaying the release of the legal opinion. Sample didn’t hold back, responding that the opinion had not yet been approved for release and based on what he had seen, he believed the board was too large and that some members seemed to think they were above accountability. “They do have to answer to the people of Jasper, am I right or wrong?” Sample challenged.

Walker’s response? A mix of deflection, smugness, and thinly veiled political undertones. “That’s what I hope this election does — we need a better city council,” he said, shifting the blame yet again. When Mr. Sample asked why he didn’t run himself, Walker replied, “Because I don’t live in the city limits.” Sample then pressed further, asking, “Why don’t you get somebody to run?” Walker’s reply? A smug, “I have,” followed by laughter as he returned to his seat. “I didn’t want to go through that, y’all, but I feel we needed to,” he added, brushing off the exchange with an air of self-importance.

Meanwhile, the energy in the room revealed a stark divide. In the footage, clapping and laughter could be heard at key moments, reinforcing Walker’s narrative. But beyond that, there was a noticeable silence from others, as if the weight of what was unfolding left them stunned.

As the meeting wrapped up, JEDCO proceeded to approve over half a million dollars in requested funds — further solidifying their ability to move forward despite lingering questions about their legitimacy, governance, and transparency.

While citizens continue to demand answers, JEDCO members seem content operating as if these concerns are merely background noise rather than urgent matters that deserve real accountability.

This meeting may have lasted longer than five minutes, but the defining moments were condensed into those brief exchanges — the smugness, the deflection, the calculated political maneuvering. The overlapping roles of certain individuals in Jasper’s leadership raise further questions about accountability and transparency — questions that deserve closer scrutiny.

And now, with Bob Mayhar running against Sample, it appears that Mayhar’s candidacy comes at the urging of Danny Walker. The stakes couldn’t be higher. This election isn’t just about seats on a council. It’s about accountability. It’s about transparency. And most of all, it’s about whether Jasper will continue to operate in the shadows or finally step into the light.

Another Jasper City Council meeting, another obstruction. Another attempt at governance, another power move by the good ol’ boys. The latest setback? Councilman Lequin Hilderbrand’s blatant no-show, which prevented a quorum and halted a crucial discussion. With Councilman DeMarcus Holmes out of town for work, Hilderbrand’s attendance was imperative to move the meeting forward. Instead, his absence cleared the way for JEDCO to proceed unchecked, emboldened by a system that seems more invested in keeping certain voices out than letting the public in.

Even more concerning, the legal opinion — paid for by the city — has never been formally discussed in a council meeting. Instead, council members received it via email but never convened to deliberate its findings. And yet, it appears that the opinion has been leaked, laying the groundwork for JEDCO’s inner circle to push forward with their plans as if transparency were optional rather than essential.

The dysfunction is no longer subtle — it’s blatant. Councilwoman Angel McCroskey has publicly stated that every meeting she has called has either been canceled, obstructed, or failed due to a lack of quorum. But she’s not backing down. She’s asserting her right, as a council member, to appoint and remove members from JEDCO and other government boards, reminding leadership that the people of Jasper deserve better than this endless cycle of avoidance and secrecy.

If you want to understand why Jasper’s growth has stalled, look no further than the current JEDCO board. A quick glance at their consecutive years of service — illustrated in the accompanying graphic — reveals a system resistant to change.

This raises an important question: Does Councilman-at-Large Lequin Hilderbrand truly represent all the people of Jasper — or just a select few?

What happens next will define whether Jasper’s leadership is truly accountable or merely a façade for backdoor dealings. The economic development board’s meeting is scheduled for today at 5:30, and all eyes should be on whether it proceeds unimpeded. Because if history tells us anything, it’s that silence today leads to regret tomorrow.

Always remember… asking questions isn’t a sign of conflict; it’s how trust is upheld and decisions are made responsibly. I will always encourage people to do their own research, to think critically, and to never be afraid to question the systems that shape their communities.

Jasper has long been a town rooted in tradition and community values. But as the town continues to grow, so do the opportunities — and challenges — that come with welcoming new ventures. As a line item in JEDCO’s agenda, Wade Nguyen’s proposed project has garnered attention, not just for its potential to reshape the local establishment scene, but for the curiosity sparked by a councilman’s email describing Nguyen’s plans as “not your typical Jasper establishment.”

The comment feels like more than just a casual observation — it’s a loaded statement that hints at something bold, unconventional, or even controversial. What exactly does the councilman mean by “not typical”? Is it the unique character of Nguyen’s previous ventures, or is there more to the story that the public hasn’t yet seen? This remark leaves residents wondering what kind of change is coming — and whether it aligns with the town’s values.

I am not sure of Mr. Nguyen’s exact plans for this property, but a simple search into his background reveals his previous ventures in Austin’s vibrant bar district, including the Hen House Basement and The Lost Lei. While The Hen House Basement has been noted for its bold and edgy atmosphere, The Lost Lei — a tropical tiki bar known for its lively vibe — was permanently closed. This raises questions about sustainability and long-term success, especially if Nguyen’s plans for Jasper mirror his previous ambitions.

Additionally, Nguyen had announced plans in 2022 to renovate a cluster of buildings in Austin’s North Alamo Street bar district into four unique venues, including 4 bars and a performance space. Despite the excitement surrounding this announcement, those plans never came to fruition, further raising concerns about his track record and feasibility.

For a town like Jasper, any development that could potentially alter the local culture must be accompanied by clear communication and public involvement. Residents deserve to understand the vision behind Nguyen’s project and how it aligns — or diverges — from the community’s values.

Economic growth is vital, but it should never come at the expense of what makes Jasper special. If Nguyen’s establishment mirrors his Austin ventures, it could bring a vibrant and modern twist to the town’s offerings. But it also raises questions about whether Jasper’s leadership has considered how such a bold and edgy venue might fit into its unique identity.

As Jasper continues to grow, its leaders must prioritize transparency and accountability in every decision. Projects like Nguyen’s should be brought before the people, fostering dialogue and ensuring that change serves the community as a whole. Growth doesn’t have to mean losing what makes Jasper special — it can mean building on its strengths while embracing thoughtful, collaborative progress.

P.S. I understand that not everyone agrees with my research or conclusions, and that’s perfectly fine. I may be wrong — and, for the sake of Jasper and its future, I hope I am. But what’s not wrong is calling for accountability and transparency from organizations like JEDCO and from all government offices. Asking questions isn’t a sign of mistrust; it’s how we uphold trust and ensure that decisions serve the community. So, I’ll leave you with this: do your own research, think critically, and never be afraid to ask questions.

Questions surrounding Gated Rentals are not new. Concerns about the company’s promises and transparency have been raised by citizens before, making now the perfect time to bring this issue back into the spotlight. With $365,000 in taxpayer-funded incentives on the line, the timeline of Gated Rentals deserves closer scrutiny — not just for what it reveals about the company, but for what it suggests about JEDCO’s vetting and allocation processes.

In January 2022, Gated Rentals announced a $65 million private equity fund designed to create housing for working-class families. This vision seemed broadly aligned with the needs of communities like Jasper, where affordable housing solutions and job creation are critical priorities.

In Jasper specifically, Gated Rentals appears to be focusing on manufacturing homes rather than building residential communities. While this effort could bring jobs to the area, it raises further questions about how closely the company’s stated mission aligns with its actual operations. The announcement of Gated Rentals’ mission was issued as a press release published on paid websites, which may raise questions about the accessibility and reach of the message.

By mid-2022, multiple LLCs began forming under the Gated Rentals name, suggesting a multi-layered approach to handling different aspects of the company’s operations. As more details emerge, it becomes evident that the network includes a staggering total of 30 LLCs. While this structure might aim to streamline specific functions, it also raises concerns about transparency.

For JEDCO, this extensive and complex web of LLCs should have prompted rigorous due diligence. How thoroughly were these entities vetted before awarding $365,000 in taxpayer-funded incentives?

As per the February 2023 KJAS report, the $365,000 incentive was already being pushed by JEDCO at that time. This raises questions about whether there was sufficient time and effort dedicated to researching and vetting Gated Rentals and its sprawling network of LLCs.

Adding to the timeline, the contract between JEDCO and Gated Rentals was not officially signed until August 26, 2024 — a gap of over a year from when the incentive was initially proposed. This delay raises further questions about JEDCO’s negotiation process and how decisions were made during that time. Why were taxpayer-funded incentives being actively pursued before securing a formal agreement? And how did JEDCO ensure accountability and alignment with community priorities during this extended period?

Following the contract signing, the performance agreement tied to Gated Rentals allows employees to live within a 100-mile radius of Jasper. While this expands the potential workforce, it also raises questions about how deeply the company’s operations are rooted in the local community and whether the benefits of taxpayer-funded incentives will primarily serve Jasper residents.

The role of JEDCO is to allocate taxpayer resources responsibly and in alignment with the needs of Jasper’s residents. Yet this timeline, paired with Gated Rentals’ intricate structure, suggests gaps in oversight and scrutiny.

• Did JEDCO conduct a comprehensive review of Gated Rentals’ capabilities and track record before making its financial commitment?
• How does JEDCO prioritize projects to ensure community funds are invested wisely and transparently?
• Are accountability measures in place to track the impact and success of Gated Rentals and its sprawling network of LLCs?

JEDCO’s mission is vital to Jasper’s growth and prosperity, but its execution must be guided by transparency and community trust. The Gated Rentals timeline highlights the need for more rigorous vetting processes and clearer accountability standards in future investments. Taxpayer dollars are a trust — one that must be handled with the utmost care, especially when the stakes are as high as affordable housing in Jasper.

Details in the comments.

What a week! I’m finally able to sit down and sift through everything, though I still haven’t had the chance to finish watching the video from Monday night’s city council meeting. While I do have thoughts (not that anyone asked) about the DETCOG building that’s up for sale, that’ll have to wait for another post later today.

During the city council meeting on Monday, when item #14 came up, Councilwoman Angel McCroskey made a motion to postpone releasing the attorney’s opinion. She proposed delaying the release “until the council could meet in executive session to discuss the communication with our city attorney, Billy Morian, and to implement any recommendations that Mr. Garza had made.” She explained, “This is not just a simple memorandum; this is an opinion from an attorney that we hired.” She added, “I feel we need a separate meeting with executive session to be advised by our city attorney (Mr. Morian) and to vote for appointments and possible removal of board members.”

Councilwoman McCroskey also revealed that after receiving the opinion, she spoke with Mr. Morian and requested an immediate meeting to discuss it, but no such meeting was called. During the council meeting, after Ms. McCroskey brought this up, the mayor directly asked Mr. Morian if he was okay with everything. It was at that moment that Mr. Morian stated his opinion, emphasizing that “the council does need to convene in a closed group session and discuss what actions need to be taken.” This exchange suggests that Mr. Morian’s stance might not have been voiced publicly if Ms. McCroskey hadn’t raised the issue.

Ms. McCroskey also made it clear she was eager to focus on getting JEDCO back on track once these important details were resolved, underscoring the need to move quickly and thoughtfully on this matter.

Yesterday, a Special Called Meeting was announced for Monday, April 21, at 3:30 p.m.

What’s more interesting is that, while the attorney’s opinion hasn’t yet been released (and is privileged for now), it seems some folks may already have an idea of what it contains — or they simply don’t care.

JEDCO has posted an agenda on their website for a meeting scheduled for April 22, including updates on “Gated Rentals” and “Wade Nguyen’s Son Asian Bistro proposal.”

Gated Rentals — while it’s unclear whether JEDCO ever directly addressed questions about this company, there was public interest — and concern — expressed on Facebook. Some residents didn’t just question how the project aligned with community needs; they raised concerns about the company itself, its structure, and its ability to deliver on its promises.

Despite these concerns, JEDCO proceeded with offering $365,000 in taxpayer-funded incentives to support infrastructure development for the project. Considering the significant financial commitment, this raises serious questions: What steps did JEDCO take to vet Gated Rentals?

In a small town like Jasper, where information travels quickly, it’s hard to believe community concerns went unnoticed. When a project raises red flags among residents, it’s critical for local organizations to take those concerns seriously. Without a transparent and thorough evaluation process, it’s difficult to trust that taxpayer money is being invested wisely.

The inclusion of Wade Nguyen’s proposal on JEDCO’s agenda is also worth noting. In an email obtained through a public records request, councilmember Lequin Hilderbrand, who also serves on the JEDCO board, relayed Nguyen’s request for an urgent meeting. Nguyen reportedly expressed a preference for meeting privately with Hilderbrand and the city manager, rather than involving others.

This raises serious concerns about transparency and governance. As both an elected official and a JEDCO board member, Mr. Hilderbrand’s dual role warrants scrutiny. While he may have been accommodating Nguyen’s request, the nature of the correspondence and the suggestion of a private meeting give the impression of underhanded dealings that bypass public accountability.

What’s more troubling is that these actions appear to reflect “business as usual” for Mr. Hilderbrand, even as the legality of JEDCO itself is under question. This raises broader concerns about whether the organization’s operations are being conducted in good faith or if decisions are being made without regard for the ongoing scrutiny and the community’s trust.

Monday’s Special Called Meeting will address reappointment and removal of JEDCO board members. This raises the question: Are we witnessing proactive governance, or a last-ditch attempt to shore up the “good ole boys” network before changes take effect?

As Jasper navigates these pressing challenges, transparency and accountability must remain at the forefront.

The community deserves clear answers about how decisions are made and who stands to benefit — whether it’s Gated Rentals, Wade Nguyen, or the JEDCO board itself. This isn’t just about individual projects or meetings; it’s about ensuring that Jasper’s future reflects the values and needs of its residents.

See comments for details.

As Jasper prepares for Monday night’s city council meeting, a significant decision looms regarding the future of JEDCO, the Jasper Economic Development Corporation. As outlined in the agenda, Item #14 states: “Consider for approval — Waive the Attorney/Client Communication to Make the Memorandum Public from Frank J. Garza, Trolio, Ream & Garza, PC.” Notably, JEDCO is not even named in the line item, leaving citizens who are just now engaging with the agenda or issue unaware of the memorandum’s focus. For such an important matter impacting Jasper’s economic future, wouldn’t it be essential to clearly reference JEDCO in the agenda to ensure transparency and better inform the public?

Let’s recap:

The City Council is tasked with appointing and reappointing members to the JEDCO board, a responsibility meant to ensure fair and transparent representation. However, during a 2008 meeting, this process took an unexpected turn when Randy Sayers presented a predetermined list of appointees rather than adhering to the council’s recommendations. This bypassed the standard practice, as noted by Councilwoman Norsworthy at the time, who remarked, “As I was looking over the names here, I was wondering why not all the council members make a recommendation of someone they would like to have on the board.”
Mayor Barber also emphasized this deviation, stating, “Normally that is how it’s handled. Normally the person nominating doesn’t hold a meeting outside of the council meeting and come up with a list.” Sayers responded by offering to add any names Norsworthy wanted to suggest, but the predetermined list ultimately overshadowed the council’s traditional role in the process.

Interestingly, the very members from Sayers’ predetermined list remain on the JEDCO board today, without undergoing reappointment. This continuity raises further questions about procedural integrity and whether historical concerns have ever been fully addressed.

Fast forward to today, and it’s crucial to ask whether the broader context of these deviations has been fully considered in the discussions surrounding JEDCO. For example, while the attorney’s opinion may primarily rely on the wording found in the 2008 City Council and JEDCO minutes, it’s worth emphasizing that everyone involved in this decision knows full well how the additions were created. Without addressing these foundational concerns and acknowledging the complexities beyond the minutes, can Jasper ensure that future decisions are built on a framework of integrity and trust?

If you recall, following a recent comment, the Jasper Jewel posed a question to all candidates: What does a reworked, strong JEDCO look like? In a recent interview, District 2 Candidate Bob Mayhar acknowledged that JEDCO’s recent criticism is probably correct, and then added, “We need to re-establish it as quickly as possible and curate a forward-thinking group of business people.” In my opinion, the deliberate use of the word “curate” suggests a strategic and selective approach to building the board. Whether his vision includes present members or a new board altogether, he further remarked that it may take a couple of elections to get the exact council needed to shape this group. Drawing from his experience with the Chamber of Commerce, Mr. Mayhar noted that it took six years to create the board they needed — again, in my opinion, a testament to the deliberate and strategic nature of building a desired outcome.

He also noted that “we have gotten a little bit bogged down on pettiness.” However, dismissing questions and collaboration — whether from the council or citizens — as “pettiness” undermines the very processes that ensure accountability and inclusivity.
Jasper doesn’t need a council or a JEDCO board that merely follows procedural yeas and nays without meaningful dialogue. Instead, the focus should be on fostering a culture of problem-solving that values the voices of current citizens.

Mr. Mayhar also emphasized the need to focus on numbers, citing projections that a million people are expected to move to Texas over the next decade. While he clarified that he doesn’t want a million people in Jasper, he expressed a desire to attract 500 or 1,000 new residents, tying this vision to the importance of having JEDCO up and running.

While planning for future growth is important, prioritizing hypothetical residents over the needs of Jasper’s existing community undermines the very foundation of public service. Jasper’s progress should begin with addressing the concerns and aspirations of the people who already call it home.

Transparency is the cornerstone of good governance, and the decision to release the memorandum presents an opportunity to build public trust. However, questions remain about the timing and context of this release. Has the council thoroughly considered the broader implications, or is this process being handled as a mere procedural formality?

In discussing JEDCO’s future, it’s vital to involve all relevant stakeholders — including JEDCO itself — while ensuring that the release of the legal opinion is accompanied by full context. However, it’s worth emphasizing that Jasper’s citizens are the ultimate stakeholders in this process, as JEDCO is fully funded by taxpayer dollars.

The silence is still deafening. As Jasper’s electoral candidates continue to sidestep the question of what a reworked, strong JEDCO looks like, the community is left wondering if the status quo is all we can expect.

The Jasper Economic Development Corporation (JEDCO) has been a fixture in our community since 1993, tasked with the mission, as candidate Bob Mayhar put it, “to bring business and grow existing business.” Yet, as businesses shutter their doors and community needs go unmet, one has to ask: Is JEDCO fulfilling its purpose, or has it become a swamp in desperate need of draining? A recent comment about a possible shoe store, which was once proposed but never materialized, highlights this disconnect — where is JEDCO when it comes to practical, community-focused initiatives like this?

ProValus has often been praised as JEDCO’s biggest success story — but at what cost? The city contributed over $3.1 million, and JEDCO added another $1.65 million, bringing the total investment to nearly $5 million. These figures were confirmed in a KJAS article by the city finance manager and the former city secretary, underscoring the staggering financial commitment from taxpayers. On top of that, ProValus received $354,825 in employee incentives — funds specifically tied to employment benchmarks. The building itself, which cost an additional $267,000 to purchase, was later deeded to ProValus. This represents a significant financial burden for a single project. And for what? A promise of jobs that came with heavy financial strings attached. With incentives like that, what business wouldn’t want to come here — or is that kind of offer reserved only for businesses that benefit the few?

But it doesn’t stop there. Gated Rentals, another ambitious project, is set to receive up to $365,000 in incentives, according to their executive EDA. While JEDCO seems eager to fund high-profile ventures, these big-ticket projects often fail to resonate with the day-to-day needs of the community. When multimillion-dollar resources are spent on outside companies, it leaves many wondering: What is being done for the local businesses that are the heart and soul of Jasper?

Meanwhile, the community waits for real, practical initiatives like the Shoe Sensation store, which could directly address everyday needs. According to a KJAS article from September 4, 2024, JEDCO’s mention of the Shoe Sensation project in the same conversation as ProValus and Gated Rentals felt more like throwing the community a bone than a sincere commitment. Where is JEDCO’s focus when businesses in our town are shutting down one by one? Isn’t their mission to ‘bring business and grow existing business’?

The problem runs even deeper. The same man who signed the 1993 articles of incorporation remains president today, along with board members who have overseen years of questionable decisions. Since a dubious adjustment in 2008, this leadership has clung to the status quo rather than delivering the change Jasper desperately needs. A “reworked, strong JEDCO” will remain an empty promise as long as it’s led by the same people responsible for years of stagnation and misplaced priorities. This isn’t about minor tweaks — it’s about rebuilding trust and demanding accountability.

In Alma Powers’ one-on-one with Clark McLane, the candidate’s call for an audit of JEDCO sounds promising on paper. But an audit by the same firms who always deliver “good news” would be nothing more than window dressing. If McLane really wants to show he’s serious about change, let’s talk about a forensic audit — one that digs into the details, shines a light on inefficiencies, and finally answers the questions this community has been asking for years. Anything less is just a political soundbite.

The disconnect between JEDCO’s activities and community needs is impossible to ignore. According to the KJAS article from September 2024, JEDCO currently sits on a $3 million reserve. How can they justify this when businesses in Jasper are closing and the community continues to struggle? Even basic infrastructure — like fixing potholes — remains neglected while resources are stockpiled or poured into outside companies. The resources are there, but the will to use them meaningfully seems absent.

It’s time for JEDCO to return to the mission it was created for. But this isn’t just JEDCO’s problem — it’s an issue for every candidate running for office. The silence from the electoral field isn’t just frustrating — it’s a glaring failure to address one of the most pressing issues facing Jasper. The people of this community deserve leaders who will stand up, answer tough questions, and commit to tangible action.

The future of JEDCO depends not on lofty mission statements or vague commitments, but on delivering real change and results. It’s about restoring faith in an organization that has failed to live up to its potential. Jasper deserves leaders who are willing to fight for change — not just recycle the same tired answers.

Anything less is a disservice to the people who call this town home. Anything less, and the people should consider dissolving this corporation and redirecting the tax money flowing through its coffers toward vital projects that directly benefit all of Jasper’s residents.

This morning, a FB friend privately asked me a question that has been on many of our minds: “How can JEDCO continue to operate?”

We are all aware of the ongoing issues, including JEDCO seating an illegal board since 2008 and not having met since October 2024. It was during that last meeting, when a board member questioned, “Are we even a legal board?” that everything halted for the corporation.

Not only have they failed to follow the laws and procedures required to maintain a legal board, but according to the Texas Open Meetings Act, EDCs are required to hold regular meetings that are open to the public. The fact that JEDCO has not met in six months raises serious concerns about their compliance with this requirement.

This entire situation raises an important question: Why does JEDCO not feel the need to follow the laws that the rest of us do? If you or I were being reviewed for illegal work in our jobs, we would not be able to proceed until the matter was completely resolved.

Also, if they are unable to meet, how are they able to fund any projects, big or small? Which illegal board member is signing the checks? As citizens, we are essentially the CEOs of JEDCO. We have the power and responsibility to demand transparency, accountability, and integrity from those who serve our community.

Call your councilman and ask the question. Let’s make our voices heard and ensure that no one is above the law. Together, we can push for the change we need and make our town a better place for everyone.

• Lequin Hilderbrand — Councilman at Large
• Ronald Sample — District 2
• DeMarcus Holmes — District 3
• Angel McCroskey — District 4

In our town, long-standing connections and backdoor deals have created entrenched networks that control opportunities and resources. These networks often operate with little accountability, protect each other from scrutiny, and stifle fairness.

Entrenched networks are groups of individuals and organizations with deep-rooted connections and influence. They use their relationships to maintain power and control, creating a system that benefits a select few while leaving others behind. These networks can include social clubs, secret societies, sororities, fraternities, family members, friends, neighbors, alumni, and professional colleagues. At the heart of these networks lies the Co-option—Impunity—Exploitation Dynamic, which explains how corruption thrives within these systems. By bringing new members into the corrupt system through benefits (co-option), ensuring that those involved are not held accountable (impunity), and taking advantage of the system for personal gain (exploitation), entrenched networks continue to thrive.

By increasing transparency and demanding accountability we can work towards dismantling these entrenched networks and creating a fairer, more just community for all.

#EndCorruption #FairnessForAll #TransparencyMatters #FightCorruption #CommunityFirst

This is what public service for the people looks like — transparency, accountability, and collaboration. Huge thanks to Councilwoman Angel McCroskey for her quick action in reaching out to the SETRPC and keeping the community informed. Her responsiveness demonstrates how government can work for its citizens when there’s a commitment to answers and solutions.

I anticipate hearing from Bob Dickinson, the program director at SETRPC, during the City Council meeting on March 10, 2025, at 6 PM. His explanation of the delay and the next steps for the project will provide vital insights for the community.

I hope KJAS Radio and East Texas Banner will leverage their incredible reach and dedicated following to inform and engage our community. Updating their coverage or publishing a new article on the City of Jasper Public Transit Pilot Project would go a long way in keeping everyone informed about the delay and the upcoming March 10 City Council meeting. Their platform plays a vital role in connecting people with important updates that impact us all.

#WeThePeople #OfThePeople #ByThePeople #ForThePeople

A few days ago, SETRPC proudly announced a public transit program designed to assist the most vulnerable members of our community. It was a glimmer of hope for many — finally, a solution to a long-standing issue! And yet, this morning, we wake up to news of an indefinite delay. No launch date. No clear answers. Just a vague explanation of “logistical issues” from Bob Dickinson, Director of Transportation, who stated they hope to resolve them as soon as possible.

Here’s the thing: When an organization rolls out marketing materials, sets a launch date, and drums up public excitement, only to pull the rug out from under us, it’s hard not to feel like we were played. Overpromising and underdelivering is one thing, but this indefinite delay feels like either gross incompetence or a deliberate tactic to distract the public. Was this program ever going to happen, or was it just a shiny object to pacify the masses?

And let’s not forget — this is a needed service, not a luxury. For many in our community, reliable public transit isn’t about convenience; it’s about survival — access to jobs, healthcare, and everyday necessities. The fact that this program is now in limbo is unacceptable.

SETRPC owes this community more than a vague statement. Why invest in marketing and a launch campaign only to delay it? Why dangle hope in front of those who need it most, only to snatch it away? And most importantly, when will this program actually become a reality?

As residents, we need to demand accountability. Mayor Anderson Land and Councilwoman Angel McCroskey, who represent our city at the SETRPC, have a responsibility to ask the tough questions and ensure that we get clear and transparent answers. Our community deserves to know what’s really going on — and to ensure that this program doesn’t fall by the wayside. This service is too vital to let slip through the cracks.

#TexasRoots #WeThePeople #AllThePeople #GoBigRed

The City Council members have unanimously decided to hire Frank H. Garza of Davidson Troilo Ream and Garza to advise on how to proceed with the Jasper Economic Development Corporation (JEDCO) board of directors. With Garza’s extensive experience in public and employment law, I believe he is the ideal candidate to navigate this complex situation.

It’s understandable that some of you may have concerns about the outcome of JEDCO. However, there is no need to worry. As evidenced by the success of other cities across our state, it is entirely possible to function effectively without an Economic Development Board. In fact, the tax money allocated to JEDCO can be redirected towards a variety of much-needed projects throughout the city. An EDC is not required to accomplish goals such as:

1. Infrastructure Improvements: Funds can be used for street repairs, maintenance, and upgrades to public utilities.
2. Public Safety: Enhancing police and fire department resources, including equipment and facilities.
3. Parks and Recreation: Developing and maintaining parks, recreational facilities, and community centers.
4. Public Transportation: Improving public transit systems, including buses and transit stations.
5. Community Development: Supporting affordable housing projects and neighborhood revitalization efforts.
6. Education and Workforce Development: Funding job training programs, scholarships, and educational initiatives.
7. Health and Wellness: Investing in public health programs, clinics, and wellness centers.
8. Environmental Projects: Initiatives for sustainability, such as green spaces, recycling programs, and energy-efficient projects.
9. Cultural and Arts Programs: Supporting local arts, cultural events, and historical preservation projects.
10. Economic Diversification: Encouraging the growth of new industries and businesses to diversify the local economy.

Although it might seem insignificant at first glance, the 1/2 of 1 cent sales tax accumulates rapidly much like the coins in a change jar. Currently, JEDCO receives over $1 million annually from this tax. Imagine the transformative impact these substantial funds could have on our community when redirected to support a variety of essential projects.

Staying informed and engaged ensures that these decisions reflect the best interests of all of us. Together, we can work toward a brighter future for Jasper.