JEDCO Was Never Meant to Be Their Personal Playground

JEDCO was never meant to be the personal playground of a select few. It was established as an economic development entity for the people of Jasper, funded by their tax dollars, with the goal of supporting and growing our local economy in a way that benefits everyone. Yet, somewhere along the way, it seems to have shifted — no longer functioning as a resource for the community, but instead operating as an exclusive club, controlled by a small, chosen group.

Transparency and accountability aren’t about tearing JEDCO down. They’re about making sure it truly serves the people, not just the few individuals who have cemented themselves in power. Jasper is filled with capable, qualified individuals who could contribute to JEDCO’s mission, yet they are rarely given the opportunity. Instead, board positions seem to be reserved for those already within the inner circle, as if leadership is determined by “who you know” rather than “who is best for the job.”

I have spoken with many citizens who have extensive experience and ideas that would be invaluable to JEDCO as part of a collaborative effort. These individuals bring fresh perspectives, strong leadership qualities, and a genuine commitment to economic growth — but instead of being welcomed into the fold, they are shut out simply because they aren’t part of the chosen few.

And while JEDCO board members often insist that the public should bring their ideas forward, I have seen, heard, and read countless instances where those efforts go nowhere. People step up, hoping to contribute, only to feel like their input is dismissed before it’s even considered. If economic development is truly meant to be a partnership between the board and the people, then why does it seem like those outside the inner circle are met with resistance instead of collaboration?

Yet, over time, it seems that some boards — including JEDCO — have drifted away from the original vision set by the Development Corporation Act of 1979. Instead of rotating leadership and embracing new perspectives, the structure has remained largely unchanged, making it difficult for fresh voices to contribute.

Economic development was never intended to be controlled by a handful of individuals indefinitely. It thrives on innovation, diverse input, and a shared commitment to the community’s growth. But when leadership positions are locked in for years, and the same names cycle through positions of influence, it becomes less about “serving the people” and more about “preserving power.”

True economic development requires inclusivity — giving qualified individuals a chance to bring fresh ideas to the table. Jasper has no shortage of talented citizens ready to contribute, but when only the chosen few are given the opportunity, the organization loses the very spirit it was built upon.

Interestingly, Mr. Walker himself referenced the Development Corporation Act of 1979 during the JEDCO meeting, acknowledging the law that set the foundation for economic development in Texas. But if JEDCO truly operates under the spirit of that act, then shouldn’t it reflect the very principles it was founded on — community engagement, fairness, and accessibility? Instead, leadership remains in the hands of a select few, making it nearly impossible for new voices to have a seat at the table.

The act wasn’t designed to create a permanent, untouchable power structure — it was designed to give communities the ability to shape their own economic future. Yet, when citizens raise concerns or express interest in contributing, they are met with resistance rather than open doors. Economic development is supposed to serve the public — not protect the control of a handful of individuals. So if JEDCO stands by this act, perhaps it’s time they start operating in alignment with it.

This isn’t how an organization funded by the public should operate. Economic development should be a collective effort, driven by inclusion, fresh ideas, and a commitment to the greater good — not by a select few who treat it as their personal institution.